![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement By Geoff Peach The Canadian and US governments are currently reviewing the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement, first penned in 1972 as a measure for the two nations to control pollution in the Great Lakes. The agreement helped to stem the flow of nutrients, particularly phosphorous, from getting into the lakes. Phosphorous was one of the culprits that led to the infamous declaration that Lake Erie was a "dead lake". Since 1972, other pollutants were revealed and 43 Areas of Concern, or AOCs, (toxic "hot spots" where high levels of pollution occurred) were identified. Hundreds of millions of dollars were spent trying to clean up these hot spots, but to date, only two AOC's have been de-listed (cleaned up). Meanwhile, to avoid the problem of other AOCs from appearing in other areas of the Great Lakes, each lake was to develop a Lakewide Area Management Plan (LaMP). All of the lakes except Lake Huron have completed a LaMP. In its place, the two national governments have set up what has been called the “Lake Huron Bi-national Partnership.” Its accomplishments to date have been pretty modest. Its intent is to develop a common strategy for addressing environmental issues on both sides of the lake, in a consistent fashion. Makes sense, but it has taken years to get to the stage it is currently. Ironically, the State of Michigan showed great leadership as far back as 1998 when it started the "Lake Huron Initiative." The Initiative was the state's attempt to develop a co-ordinated approach to dealing with pollution and other environment related issues. They invited the two federal governments and representatives from the Province of Ontario to be involved in the process. Staff from the Coastal Centre attended those meetings and were sometimes the only Canadian representatives present. The frustration was and to a large degree, continues to be a lack of commitment on the part of the two federal governments to provide resources to Lake Huron to develop and implement an effective management plan, designed to prevent further degradation of the lake's ecosystems. Ten years ago Lake Huron was described as "The Forgotten Lake" because of this lack of attention, relative to the other lakes. The current Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement review is an opportunity to let our governments know that, yes, there is a Lake Huron, and it has environmental issues that need to be addressed. The Coastal Centre has submitted its concerns during this review process. Some of the Centre's recommendations included: The review process runs until February 18, 2007. Comments should be made under the Ontario Environmental Bill of Rights Registry (EBR Registry Number: PA07E0001 ). For more about the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement, see: ****** Over a tonne of CO2 is emitted when you: * Drive 1600 kilometres in a large Sport Utility Vehicle. Now, here's what you can do: http://www.earthday.net/resources/2006materials/Top10.aspx |
|